While the Canadian Criminal Code sets out the federal impaired driving offences, provinces and territories have authority over: licensing of drivers; the regulation of highways, vehicle ownership, automobile insurance, and traffic enforcement; and legislation dealing with civil liability, victim support programs and victim compensation.
Each jurisdiction can enact legislation and programs that minimize impaired driving and better safeguard victims. In fact, much of the recent decrease in impaired driving deaths and the progress made in supporting victims is the result of provincial/territorial initiatives.
However, major challenges remain. Canada’s impaired driving record is still poor compared to other similar democracies.
Since 1998, MADD Canada has conducted regular reviews of provincial/territorial impaired driving legislation. Previously referred to as the Rating the Provinces report, the review’s purpose has been to identify effective measures that the provinces/territories could implement to reduce impaired driving and support victims.
The Top Ten Report: Provincial/Territorial Measures to Minimize Impaired Driving and Support Victims
MADD Canada’s latest recommendations are offered in The Top Ten Report: Provincial/Territorial Measures to Minimize Impaired Driving and Support Victims.
The report provides each province/territory with an individualized set of 10 recommendations, including three priority recommendations, which address what MADD Canada believes to be the most pressing concerns in each jurisdiction. The overall provincial/territorial recommendations are briefly outlined below. For the specific recommendations for each province or territory, please see the full report.
The report reflects MADD Canada’s particular concern about impaired driving among young and novice drivers, a group that has been dramatically over-represented in impairment-related crash deaths and injuries. It also reflects the preference for provincial administrative measures, rather than criminal or court-based sanctions, for impaired driving offenders who have not caused a crash resulting in a death or injury. Recent experience in British Columbia and Alberta indicate that immediate roadside administrative measures are far less labour intensive and appear to be more effective than criminal proceedings in deterring impaired driving. (This emphasis on provincial administrative sanctions is not inconsistent with our efforts to ensure that repeat impaired driving offenders and impaired drivers who cause fatal or personal injury crashes are held criminally responsible and are appropriately sanctioned.)
Finally, some of the recommendations to the provinces and territories build on federal measures implemented as part of Bill C-46, which was passed in 2018. In order to maximize the benefits of those federal measures, provinces and territories may need to enhance police training, resources and roadside testing for drugged driving, and implement comprehensive mandatory alcohol screening programs.